In the new version coming out this weekend...
GenoPro Home  |  Get Started With My Genealogy Tree  |  Buy  |  Login  |  Privacy  |  Search  |  Site Map
 
GenoPro Support Forum
Home        Members    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        



In the new version coming out this weekend... Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Post #6980 Posted 7/4/2005 4:40:39 PM
Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Customers
Last Login: 11/12/2008 5:00:44 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 120, Visits: 431
Dan,


will the genomaps crossing problem also be fixed?

i.e. when a marriage crosses genomaps, the person is somehow married to Unknown....

rgds,
Ronald
Post #6981 Posted 8/18/2005 6:49:19 PM


Legendary Master

Legendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary Master This user is an important contributor to the translation of GenoPro 

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 9:21:17 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.4.0.3
Posts: 3,523, Visits: 14,875
Not this problem. This issue has been there for a long time (since the introduction of the GenoMaps). You are welcome to read the details at Topic6218-59-1.aspx

Fixing this bug will require a fair amount of work. I don't want to delay Beta13f. I can release Beta13g in a few more days...


Post #6982 Posted 8/18/2005 6:49:19 PM
Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Customers
Last Login: 11/12/2008 5:00:44 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 120, Visits: 431
Not this problem. This issue has been there for a long time (since the introduction of the GenoMaps). You are welcome to read the details at Topic6218-59-1.aspx

Fixing this bug will require a fair amount of work. I don't want to delay Beta13f. I can release Beta13g in a few more days...


I was a little puzzled since the referenced topic describes siblings. I am talking about marriages, but looking at the exact content, I think you're right to expect that this marriage problem is caused by the same thing.

Effectively any relation from an individual which is in one of the earlier (in the list) genomaps, whereas its hyperlinked copy has relations in later genomaps will not reveal those relations from the later genomaps when generating the data for the individual within the earlier genomap.

Am I correct in describing the issue?

rgds,
Ronald
Post #6983 Posted 8/18/2005 6:49:19 PM


Legendary Master

Legendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary Master This user is an important contributor to the translation of GenoPro 

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 9:21:17 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.4.0.3
Posts: 3,523, Visits: 14,875
Am I correct in describing the issue?

Yes, indeed. Resolving the problem is not a "Sunday Afternoon" fix.


Post #6984 Posted 8/18/2005 6:49:19 PM
Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Customers
Last Login: 11/12/2008 5:00:44 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 120, Visits: 431
Fixing this bug will require a fair amount of work. I don't want to delay Beta13f. I can release Beta13g in a few more days...

Dan,

Having 13f would be good. :lol: It will definitely limit the amount of time it takes me to run a single report. (since it always crashes :wink: )...

Would 13g contain the cross-genomaps fix? I am so curious since I am almost finished with my translation/report and having so many individuals cross genomap hyperlinks, I don't want to publish the site until that bug is fixed....

...and of course, the most horrible question of all...... :evil:

Any ETA for 13g? :twisted:

rgds,
Ronald
Post #6985 Posted 8/18/2005 6:49:19 PM


Legendary Master

Legendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary Master This user is an important contributor to the translation of GenoPro 

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 9:21:17 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.4.0.3
Posts: 3,523, Visits: 14,875
Any ETA for 13g?

Probably a week. This issue is a high priority on my list. During the past month, I have been working on many things, including shopping for new support forum (http://support.genopro.com/) and a re-design of the website GenoPro.com.


Post #6986 Posted 8/18/2005 6:49:19 PM
Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Customers
Last Login: 11/12/2008 5:00:44 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 120, Visits: 431
Any ETA for 13g?

Probably a week. This issue is a high priority on my list. During the past month, I have been working on many things, including shopping for new support forum (http://support.genopro.com/) and a re-design of the website GenoPro.com.


Thanks Dan,

I appreciate this a lot,

rgds,
Ronald
Post #6987 Posted 8/18/2005 6:49:19 PM
Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Customers
Last Login: 11/12/2008 5:00:44 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 120, Visits: 431
Am I correct in describing the issue?

Yes, indeed. Resolving the problem is not a "Sunday Afternoon" fix.


It seems it's even more generic, and therefore probably even more harder to fix :-(

Since one of my ancestors was married 4 times, and since the tool cannot handle that properly, I created an internal hyperlink in the same Genomap. When generating the report, it also misses 3 of out 4 of the marriages.

rgds,
Roald
Post #6988 Posted 8/18/2005 6:49:19 PM
Forum Master

Forum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum Master This user is an important contributor to the GenoPro community This user is a contributor to FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com 

Group: Customers
Last Login: Today @ 6:24:37 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 825, Visits: 7,407
Have tried the new report and, so far found two problems with pictures that need to be passed to the htm experts.

First: Mozilla displays the first picture but does not retrieve any others on the list.

Second: IE6 does move through pictures but the first new image appears as a thick blue line. Subsequent pictures behave correctly, although I did see one example where retrieval of the initial image caused it to be the wrong aspect ratio, corrected later.

These 'features' were present in early versions of the Ron's version, so hopefully can be sorted soon. ?2.13g?

The only other thing noted so far is that the hyperlinks within a family are only one way. Links are shown to parents and children but only the parent link works. This is in both IE6 and Mozilla.

Just looked at this again and it is slightly more complicated. A link to a child works first time round but can not be repeated. Will investigate further