Hi Ron,

I have at last tested the privacy filter and found this <unknown> problem and would like to change this to <living> for all as I exclude all "living" systematically and don't think the other word options you mentioned would apply to my tree as the "living are to be found in the private trees protected by password access, but can't download your zip as the last time.

Please could you post it again labelled as ".txt" to be renamed on arrival like you did last time or send me the zip by email.

The whole report system is now incredible when I think of what I went through to paste all the details into the old version!

It will be great when we can see all the trees on the site as well.

If you are using IE there is a known problem downloading .zip files from the GenoPro site. I had to use Firefox to get the file.

 I must also hide the children on the family page. <done>

Panic over ! I found the solution in the dictionary thing!

The report is now perfect for me as I only include myself as a "living" and have already made a copy of my page with the "had" changed to "has" etc. to copy in each time I redo a tree.

I had to replace the living person with a box "Living" ticked as dead and, generate another report, change the "had" to "has" etc and save hers and the parent's , husband's and son's pages elsewhere.

I then replaced the Living box with the normal one and after generation I added the changed pages to the report which was a bit complicated but eventually worked for the report on my computer.

But I can't see how to upload these pages to the GenoPro site as it appears that the upload is direct to the site from the .gno

I wondered if there was another way round this for the generator.

Just generate the report again on familytrees.genopro.com.

In the tree I uploaded I had manually removed the living except for myself which is why I seem to be an only child.

The idea is to permanently keep these few pages in a folder and upload them to any later update without having to change the archive each time before generating the report and also to avoid errors.

My main tree is very big, but it is only my close family which will have these corrections for myself, my sister and my cousin and what I do with my web site is to upload just these pages to overwrite the old ones.

I have generated a report using my sister's blanked out box marked dead and ticked my box dead as well and I came up as the oldest and the "Had" was there instead of "Has" so I cannot upload direct with the appropriate changes and need to upload the corrected pages as suggested earlier unless the Edit button would allow to edit the chosen page on site.

Thanks

The report generator uses the data from the Properties dialogue to generate the report, so all the affected families will have to be changed.

I too am interested in there being a way to change the tag in the report generator.  When I am filtering out the "Living" family members from my tree, I'd like these individuals to show as <Living> instead of <Unknown>.  This way, when the report is published to my website it will show that I do have information about this person, but because they are living, it is not accessible to the public.  With the report showing them as <unknown>, it may be mistaken that I don't have any information about this family member.

The last post on here said that this was going to be looked at, but that was in version 15h.  I am wondering now that 2.0.0.5 is out, is this a possible option or maybe in the next few patches?  The HTML report generator is among the top 2 reasons why I LOVE GenoPro and will GREATLY appreciate any and all enhancements that the future brings.

Thank You,

Shane Kimbler

<_NoName T="&lt;unknown&gt;" />

dictionary entry by

<_NoName T="&lt;hidden&gt;" />

By doing so, the names of the people who are filtered out due to the privacy settings won't display "<unknown>" but "<hidden>" instead.

In order to avoid confusion with people whose name I really don't know and who would also show up as <hidden>, I have given these "(unknown)" as family name.  I hope there are no other situations where the "_NoName" tag is used ...